Claude's three capability tiers: Haiku is fastest and cheapest, Sonnet balances speed and capability, Opus is most powerful but slowest and most expensive.
Full Explanation+
01 · What is this?
Anthropic divides Claude into three capability tiers, named after poetic forms: Haiku (minimal), Sonnet (moderately complex), and Opus (most complex). All three models share the same trained values and foundational capabilities, but differ in computational resources, training scale, and reasoning depth. Haiku is designed for quick responses, low latency, and low cost; Sonnet balances speed and capability; Opus handles the most complex reasoning tasks, at the cost of slower speed and higher fees.
In practice, the cost ratio is approximately Haiku : Sonnet : Opus = 1 : 5 : 15. This means using Opus for a task Haiku could handle costs 14 times more. At scale, this gap directly translates into massive monthly billing differences.
02 · Why does it exist?
Different tasks require different reasoning depths. The three-tier design allows developers and users to choose the right tool based on task requirements. This isn't just a cost issue, it's also a speed issue — Haiku's response speed is typically 3-5 times faster than Opus, which significantly impacts user experience. For applications with large volumes of API calls, model selection directly determines commercial viability.
03 · How does it affect your decisions?
Decision framework for choosing a model:
First ask: Does this task have a single correct answer? If yes (data extraction, format conversion, simple classification), Haiku is usually sufficient. If judgment, reasoning, or creativity is needed, Sonnet is the starting point. Deep analysis and multi-step logical deduction — consider Opus.
Actually test, don't guess subjectively. Try Haiku first, test output quality, upgrade to Sonnet if insufficient, and only upgrade to Opus if confirmed necessary. Many developers find that tasks they thought needed Opus are fully handled by Sonnet.
Calculate cost impact — don't ignore scale effects. Opus monthly cost is 15x Haiku. What additional business value does that gap deliver?
04 · What should you do?
Things you can do immediately:
Build model selection rules and code them in. Build explicit model selection logic: Haiku for classification tasks, Sonnet for general Q&A, Opus for deep analysis. Automatically switch based on task type without manual decision each time.
Test Haiku as a baseline. If you're currently using Sonnet or Opus, switch your 10 most common prompts to Haiku for testing. This test often surprises — more tasks than expected can be completed with cheaper models.
Track model cost distribution. Use Anthropic Console's usage analysis features to identify the highest-cost task types and assess whether they can be downgraded to cheaper models.
Real-World Example+
Scenario: Building an AI-driven content platform with 50,000 API calls per day.
Initial design (all Sonnet): Average 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per call. Cost: $675/day = $20,250/month.
Doing just the classification Sonnet → Haiku optimization (30% of calls):
- Haiku 15,000 calls: ~$16/day
- Sonnet 35,000 calls: ~$473/day
- Total: $489/day = $14,670/month
- Savings vs original $20,250/month: $5,580/month (~28% reduction)
Key insight: Classification tasks typically don't need Sonnet's capabilities — Haiku's classification accuracy is nearly the same as Sonnet's in most scenarios, but at 1/12 the cost. This optimization requires no architectural changes — just selecting a different model parameter based on task type.
Diagram
Feel free to share. Please credit the source.
Common Misconceptions+
✕ Misconception 1
× Myth 1: Opus is smarter than Sonnet, so Opus always produces better output quality. For many tasks, the output quality difference between Sonnet and Opus is nearly indistinguishable — especially for general text generation, translation, and summarization. Opus's advantages lie in complex multi-step reasoning and nuanced analysis. If your task doesn't require these capabilities, using Opus just costs more.
✕ Misconception 2
× Myth 2: Haiku can only handle simple tasks — anything moderately complex requires Sonnet or Opus. The simple in Haiku refers to its cost efficiency for simple tasks, not a claim that it can only handle simple tasks. In practice, Haiku can complete many seemingly non-simple tasks. Test Haiku first rather than assuming upfront that you need a more powerful model.
The Missing Link+
Direct Impact
Haiku: Low cost (1/15 of Opus), fast, suitable for high-frequency calls. Downside: underperforms on tasks requiring deep reasoning.
Sonnet: Best balance of cost and capability, suitable for most daily tasks. 5x more expensive than Haiku.
Opus: Most powerful reasoning capability, suitable for high-value tasks requiring deep analysis. Expensive (15x Haiku), slower.
Strategic recommendation: Tier your tasks — Haiku for high-frequency low-complexity, Sonnet for moderate-complexity daily tasks, Opus only for low-frequency high-value complex tasks. This strategy typically reduces costs by 30-50% with almost no quality impact.
Generate Share Card
Claude MeGlossary
新手
Claude Model Tiers (Haiku / Sonnet / Opus)
Claude 模型等級(Haiku / Sonnet / Opus)
Haiku: fastest & cheapest, cost baseline 1×
Sonnet: balanced, ~5× cost, default for most tasks
Opus: most powerful, ~15× cost, use only when needed
Test Haiku first, upgrade only if insufficient
The Missing Link
Don't default to Opus. Haiku handles 70% of tasks at 1/15 the cost. Test Haiku first, upgrade only if insufficient — that's how you control API costs.